Lawmakers Are Rolling Back Food Safety Rules

In the deal to end the government shutdown, lawmakers added clauses that would temporarily bar states from regulating which foods manufacturers can label “healthy” and suspend new listeria regulations.

General Mills Inc. Food Products Ahead Of Earnings Figures

Cereal companies have opposed a Biden-era food labeling rule, claiming that it would “disqualify many grain foods . . . from using the term ‘healthy.’” (Daniel Acker / Bloomberg via Getty Images


After the Senate buried provisions stripping food safety regulations in its emergency spending bill to end the forty-four-day government shutdown, the House followed suit and introduced additional clauses that would temporarily bar states from regulating which foods manufacturers can label “healthy” and suspend new listeria regulations for “low-risk ready-to-eat” foods, according to a Lever review of the legislation.

The move follows a multimillion-dollar lobbying blitz and pushback from companies and organizations that stand to benefit from the provisions. It also comes amid growing public concern over listeria outbreaks, including those linked to ready-to-eat foods that regulators generally consider low risk.

The House spending bill includes a provision, effective until 2028, that bars states from enacting their own labeling requirements for foods deemed “healthy,” such as restricting the definition to foods with limited amounts of saturated fats and added sugars. The provision also establishes a grace period for food companies to adopt new “healthy” food labeling changes.

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.