The Philips Curve Is a Tool for Waging Class War on Workers

Silas Xuereb

The Phillips curve holds that low unemployment drives inflation, meaning that controlling prices requires putting workers out of work. Its continuing influence shows how power over the money supply shapes class power.

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh speaks during a news conference following Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Federal Reserve headquarters on September 16, 2026, in Washington, DC.

For decades, central banks have relied on the Phillips curve to justify fighting inflation by putting people out of work. Monetary policy is not apolitical: it is a key battleground in the struggle between workers and capital. (Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)


For nearly three-quarters of a century, central banks and policymakers have relied on the Phillips curve: the idea that inflation can be kept in check by disciplining worker power and putting restraints on employment levels. In 2026, does that theory, and the depoliticization of monetary policy that accompanies it, still make sense? Perhaps the real question isn’t whether every inflation spike has the same cause and cure, but whether central banks should use higher unemployment as their default tool to stabilize prices at all.

Jacobin’s David Moscrop recently talked with Silas Xuereb, a researcher and policy analyst with Canadians for Tax Fairness and a coauthor of the report The New Robber Barons: A Quarter Century of Wealth Concentration in Canada.


David Moscrop

What is the Phillips curve?

Silas Xuereb

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.