Trump’s Authoritarian Architecture Begs for an Alternative
Donald Trump’s victory arch is so ugly and uninspired, so befitting his cynical, corrupt, tacky presidency, that it might actually offer us an opportunity to seriously consider something more befitting a just and democratic society.

The Triumphal Arch proposed by Donald Trump has been rightly condemned by architectural critics. But that opposition has not posited its own vision of what contemporary, democratic American monuments to the nation could look like. (Al Drago / Getty Images)
Upon walking through an entrance of a mock-up model of Donald Trump’s proposed United States Triumphal Arch, a visitor could plainly see it was already falling apart. The miniature triumphal arch at the Great America State Fair, which took place June 25 through July 10, offered a sorry attempt at grandiosity. Looking more like an oversize board game token than a scaled-down future national monument, the arch looked more than a little clunky, painted a dull gray and showing its panel seams inelegantly. The gold eagles and Statue of Liberty reproduction at the top looked flimsy, and the main mass was adorned only with a few glue-on wreaths, decorative panels, and four bulky protuberances.
On the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the awkward portal opened to a hastily devised vanity fair whose exhibits on states, territories, and big businesses were pumped up by flags, empty slogans, and depictions of famous residents while providing hardly any flavor of who calls the nation home today. The Great America State Fair offered the viewpoint of a presidency not interested in Americans but just a shambolic performance of imperial unity through cheap, largely meaningless attractions. The United States Triumphal Arch, unironically pitched by Trump as a monument to military victories amid the US’s failure to end the US-Israeli war with Iran, is a much more expensive and enduring version of the same vapid commemorative spirit.
A Fitting Monument to Trump’s Governance
The original proposal came from right-wing anti-modernist critic Catesby Leigh, who garnered the support of developer Rodney Mimms Cook Jr, Trump’s pick to head the United States Commission on Fine Arts. Poised to stand 250 feet tall atop the Arlington Memorial Bridge between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, the arch has ignited outrage from historic preservationists, architects, and historians as a visual offense and violation of historic viewsheds in the Capitol. Some have even compared the arch to Albert Speer’s proposed German Arch of Triumph, which would have been a 400-foot symbol of the Nazi victory in World War II that never came.