Demolishing the East Wing Without Much of a Fight
Historic preservation groups responded to the White House East Wing's demolition with equivocal statements and "deep concern." Their failure to mobilize reveals how dependent liberal advocacy has become on the billionaires funding Trump's regime.

As Trump builds his ballroom, historic preservation groups issue tepid statements. The episode reveals a sad truth: liberal advocacy groups are too afraid of Trump-aligned billionaires to mount real resistance, and Trump knows it. (Aaron Schwartz / CNP / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The stunning, rapid demolition of the East Wing of the White House does not sound the death knell of the United States of America, despite the breathless pronouncements of some observers. But it is a bellwether for the exhaustion of liberal protest politics, as the interest groups many had hoped would fight Donald Trump’s agenda are instead cowering, too afraid of Trump-aligned billionaires to mount a genuine opposition.
Most of the East Wing now lies in a landfill, Trump is rejoicing in his edifice complex, and a host of preservation advocates are watching from the sidelines, hiding behind equivocal, last-minute press releases and “strongly worded” letters.
Trump’s audacious ballroom plan has thwarted any meaningful expert review that would have slowed down the dream of the would-be authoritarian grandee. The National Historic Preservation Act, enacted in 1966, specifically exempts the headquarters for the three branches of government — the White House, the Supreme Court Building, and the Capitol — from preservation review by the National Park Service under Section 107. Deference to executive power is embedded in the first comprehensive federal historic preservation law.