How Massachusetts Teachers Transformed Their Union
Outgoing Massachusetts Teachers Association president Max Page reflects on a decade of rank-and-file reformers turning a cautious, staff-driven union into a militant, member-led force by striking, winning stronger contracts, and pushing to tax the rich.

Max Page speaking during an election watch party at the Fairmont Copley Plaza Hotel. (Danielle Parhizkaran / the Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Max Page is president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA), one of the largest state affiliates of the National Education Association and the largest union in New England, representing roughly 117,000 education workers from pre-K through higher education. A professor of architecture and history at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Page is one of the founding members of Educators for a Democratic Union (EDU), a reform caucus that has spent more than a decade reshaping the MTA’s politics, structure, and strategy.
Page is the third consecutive EDU-backed president, following Barbara Madeloni and Merrie Najimy, and is serving the second of his constitutionally limited two terms. The election campaign for his successor is currently underway. Under EDU’s leadership, the MTA has moved from a relatively cautious, staff-driven union, which had too often gone along with destructive education reform policies, toward a more militant, member-driven model centered on democratic bargaining, strike readiness, and large-scale “common good” campaigns like the successful effort to tax millionaires and expand public investment.
Jacobin columnist Chris Brooks spoke with Page about what it takes to successfully drive a reform agenda, how high-participation bargaining changes both outcomes and consciousness, and why taxing the rich has become central to rebuilding working-class power.