Big Companies Are Already Asking Trump for Favors

Amazon helped fund Donald Trump’s inauguration. The retail giant and the insurer UnitedHealth waited less than a day to start begging the new administration to shut down their shareholders’ calls for transparency.

Jeff Bezos attends a luncheon following inauguration of US president Donald Trump at the US Capitol on January 20, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images)

On the same day Jeff Bezos sat in the front row of the inauguration (that Amazon helped finance), his retail giant sent nine letters pressing the Trump administration to let the company block votes on initiatives from its own shareholders. These include proposals to disclose more information about Amazon’s treatment of warehouse workershandling of private medical datalobbying activitiesartificial intelligence–related energy use, and employee pay gaps.

UnitedHealth also called in some favors. A day after Amazon’s move, UnitedHealth asked Donald Trump’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to allow it to block votes on shareholder proposals requiring the company to 1) audit previous customer denial claims to see if they were inaccurate and 2) disclose “how often prior authorization requirements or denials of coverage lead to delay or abandonment of medical treatment.” UnitedHealth has among the highest claim denial rates in the country.

We reported that during Trump’s first term, his regulators passed rules that made it more difficult for shareholders to force votes on their proposals. The Biden administration pushed back. Now Trump’s SEC chair nominee is Paul Atkins, who has criticized what he calls the “abusive use of the shareholder proposal process.” Because of the timing of Amazon and UnitedHealth’s letters, regulatory decisions about their shareholder resolutions will be made by Trump’s officials — not Joe Biden’s.

Last September, House Republicans passed the Prioritizing Economic Growth Over Woke Policies Act, which aimed to give companies limitless power to exclude shareholder proposals. The legislation also would have limited the SEC’s power to require public companies to report on issues considered unrelated to their financial health.