Justin Trudeau Doesn’t Understand Democracy
Justin Trudeau’s broken promise on electoral reform reveals his elitist view of governance. He seems to misunderstand that democracy is not about authorizing elite rule, but about enabling popular self-rule.

Justin Trudeau attending a press conference on October 14, 2024, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada. (Dave Chan / AFP via Getty Images)
In 2015, Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party rode into power on the back of an electoral campaign that made a clear, bold promise to Canadians: to “make every vote count.” They pledged that 2015 would be the last election under the outdated first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system, committing to a democratic process — involving a special parliamentary committee, consultation with experts, and public input — to direct the process of electoral reform and strengthen Canada’s democracy. This promise resonated with Canadians after years of widespread advocacy for electoral reform, sparking excitement about the possibility of a more representative voting system. When the Liberals abandoned electoral reform months later, many saw it as a major betrayal of the ideals that had won them a majority government.
Since 2015, Trudeau has also withdrawn from genuine public dialogue, relying instead on carefully curated media appearances and teleprompter-aided speeches. His appearance earlier this month on Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith’s podcast, Uncommons, was an exception that gave us a rare insight into the prime minister’s unfiltered thoughts. During the interview, Trudeau admits he abandoned electoral reform when the process didn’t choose his preferred result of ranked ballots. The cynicism behind his broken promise is bad enough on its own, but the details of his comments also suggest a more serious problem: Trudeau neither understands nor believes in real democracy.
The Beginning and End of Electoral Reform
Part of the Liberals’ 2015 campaign promise was to create two mechanisms to ensure democratic control over the process of reforming the electoral system. The first was the all-party House of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform (ERRE), which exercised representative democratic control: it guided the process, investigated the alternatives in depth, heard from expert witnesses, ensured cross-party support, and enabled parliamentary oversight. The second mechanism was made up of a range of public consultations that ensured a degree of popular democratic control: an e-consultation platform, town halls across the country, mail and phone surveys, and petitions that gave all Canadians the opportunity to participate in deciding on a new electoral system.