Swedish Social Democracy Has Always Been Contradictory
Over the last century, Sweden’s Social Democrats built a world-leading welfare state. But the party’s role in undoing some of its own past achievements also shows the contradictions in its project of democratizing capitalism.

Swedish Social Democratic prime minister Olof Palme, photographed in Stockholm in September 1973. (Daniel Simon / Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images)
To say that social democracy was the dominant force of Swedish public life during the last century is an understatement. It’s often said here that “everyone is a social democrat — they just vote for different parties.”
There are good material reasons for this. From the cradle to the grave, a person could be submerged in social democracy. They might be helped by the various institutions that the party built, have their daily bread working for and consuming from the organizations it led, and even be buried by the movement’s own funeral home. The Social Democrats have been in power for more than seventy-five of the last hundred years.
The party’s domination was so strong that when it weakened, from the 1970s and onward, from near-total unstoppability to “only” being the strongest party, the Swedish political field had its center of gravity thrown off course. Whether, and when, a new equilibrium will be achieved is still uncertain.