To Fight Imperialism Abroad, Build Class Struggle at Home

Vivek Chibber

The idea that workers in wealthy countries like the United States are part of a “labor aristocracy” bought off with the fruits of imperialism is nonsense. The best way to build a movement against US imperialism is to build the labor movement domestically.

Antiwar Protesters Carrying Placards

Antiwar demonstrators carrying placards in a May Day Parade during World War I. (Bettmann Archive via Getty Images)


The terms “imperialism” and “colonialism” have reentered the collective vocabulary with a vengeance in recent years. But they seem to mean different things to different people, who mix and match differing ideas from Marxist, liberal, and postcolonial theories.

At a recent conference in Germany, Socialism in Our Time, organized by Jacobin and Transform! Europe, Alexander Brentler spoke with Vivek Chibber, professor of sociology at New York University, about past attempts by Marxists to theorize imperialism and what a coherent account of the phenomenon must offer today. In both his books Locked in Place and Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital, Chibber deals, among other things, with imperialism and colonialism from different angles. In his view, Marxist accounts of imperialism are still best suited to explain the state of the world, both economically and geopolitically. But there are still missing pieces, especially when it comes to understanding the world that has emerged since the end of the Cold War.


Alexander Brentler

In very simple terms, what is imperialism?

Vivek Chibber

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.