No, We Don’t Want a “War Economy” to Deal With the Pandemic

Many pundits have likened the massive government interventions in response to COVID-19 to states' resource mobilization during the World Wars. But this “war socialism” has never been the same thing as serving human need — and today it’s being used as a means of propping up private capital.

Food Bank Distributes To Those In Need At The Barclays Center In Brooklyn

Workers distribute food bank donations at the Barclays Center on May 15, 2020 in Brooklyn, New York. (Stephanie Keith / Getty Images)


By some accounts, Western leaders have beaten the Left at its own game. A Conservative British prime minister has come around to enacting half of Labour’s demonized 2019 manifesto. Trump is intervening directly in the production decisions of large US corporations. And the center-right government of the largest German state is providing free food and drink for staff in all hospitals, care homes, and similar institutions.

Once again, establishment media have reason to proclaim that “we are all socialists now,” as Newsweek magazine did after Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package passed Congress at the height of the financial crisis in early 2009. A few months before that famous Newsweek cover, Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez had already mocked “comrade Bush” for being “to the left of me now” after announcing plans to invest heavily in large US banks in an attempt to stabilize them.

Then, as now, the intention behind throwing neoliberal dogma overboard is clear: capitalism has to be saved, by any means necessary. “To avert socialism, we must briefly become socialists,” a senior editor of conservative British newspaper The Times asserted in late March. But what kind of socialism is used to save capitalism from itself — and what does its “co-optation” mean for us?

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.