Beware the Quick Fix

In the wake of Janus, some union leaders are looking for a technical fix or a way to partner with the boss. It's a trap.

Union Supporters Rally In Chicago As Supreme Court Hears Janus v AFSCME

Members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) hold a rally in Chicago on February 26, 2018, the day of arguments in the Supreme Court case Janus v. AFSCME. Scott Olson / Getty


In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Janus decision, a new approach to financing unions called “direct reimbursement” is gaining traction with Democratic politicians, academics, and even the New York Times editorial board.

It boils down to this: rather than public sector workers paying dues, their government employer would pay an equivalent amount directly to the union. Proponents claim this approach would neutralize the impact of the Janus decision and shore up union budgets.

The idea has legs. New York’s most senior Democratic assemblyman, Richard Gottfried, is sponsoring a bill to allow public sector unions to negotiate this scheme into their contracts. Hawaii is entertaining a version too.

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.