The US-Australia Alliance Is a Charter for Imperialism, Not a Defensive Pact

Prime Minister Scott Morrison claims that the alliance with Washington is crucial to keep Australia safe from aggressors. But a look at history shows this to be a myth. The alliance has always been a vehicle for Australia's rulers' imperial ambitions.

Australian prime minister Scott Morrison visits the ANZUS Corridor that honors the 1951 Australian, New Zealand, United States security treaty at the Pentagon in September 2019. (Lisa Ferdinando / US Secretary of Defense)


Australian prime minister Scott Morrison didn’t waste much time when Joe Biden won the US election. Less than a week after Biden’s confirmation as president-elect, Morrison invited him to celebrate the seventieth anniversary of the Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS), describing the treaty as “the bedrock of our security foundations in Australia since that alliance was first established.”

The Australian ruling class has long championed the US alliance as being vital to Australia’s defense. In the name of that alliance, Australian soldiers have fought battles on almost every continent on Earth. Yet Australian military analysts and multiple defense white papers agree on a point that should already be obvious to anyone with a basic knowledge of geography: Australia is hardly a likely target for invasion.

So why maintain ANZUS? It’s common, especially on the Left, to view Australian foreign policy as an extension of US foreign policy. To be sure, many of Australia’s military adventures have defended and extended American imperialism. However, as historian Tom O’Lincoln has argued, it’s incorrect to see Australia simply as a US proxy.

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.