Jon Stewart’s Post-Partisan Critique of American Politics Is Stuck in 2004
Jon Stewart’s new political comedy Irresistible wants to be a scathing critique of the media, big money, and Beltway corruption. But as satire, it’s weighed down by the comic’s let’s-all-just-get-along politics.

Steve Carell and Rose Byrne in Jon Stewart’s new political satire, Irresistible.
One of the defining moments of Jon Stewart’s career remains his famous 2004 appearance on CNN’s Crossfire. Like many of my fellow millennials, I watched the clip dozens of times, and parts of it would linger in my memory for years; it had a far greater resonance than any of the televised debates from that year’s election season (all of which I forgot about in a matter of days).
Revisit the appearance in 2020, and it’s still easy to see why it had such an impact. Skewering hosts Tucker Carlson and Paul Begala as a pair of “hacks,” Stewart satisfyingly eviscerated the noxious partisan theater that so often masquerades as political debate on cable TV — correctly bemoaning a media culture that prizes empty adversarialism and histrionics over the genuine exchange of ideas. Pointed and funny, it was an example of what Stewart did best during his many years as host of The Daily Show: expose the political and media class with a hatred that often seemed genuinely pure.
Though I certainly didn’t realize it at the time, the famous Crossfire appearance was emblematic of another, somewhat less laudable streak running throughout Stewart’s career — one altogether closer to the why-can’t-we-all-just-get-alongism favored by the very same Beltway talking heads he has so long disdained. “Why do we have to fight?” was his opening salvo at the show and its two hosts, and Stewart would channel an identical reflex some six years later at the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear, convened to denounce a rancor it more or less contended was being imposed from above.