For most people, Frank Bisignano is known for two things: being the president and CEO of Fiserv, and now President Donald Trump’s nominee to head the Social Security Administration (SSA). Within Fiserv he’s known for something else: overseeing a pitiless program of rolling layoffs in the name of cutting costs.

Maybe no part of the Trump administration’s program of dismantling federal government agencies has generated as much concern as its drastic cuts to the SSA, the agency responsible for trillions of dollars’ worth of payments to retirees, people with disabilities, and millions of other Americans, and which is already seeing its workers laid off en masse, its offices shuttered, and some of its core services ended.

If Bisignano is confirmed, the White House may soon have an ideal ally in this effort: as chief executive of both Fiserv and First Data before that, he has been responsible for cuts to worker benefits, branch closings, and thousands of layoffs.

Since Bisignano took over as CEO of the payment processing firm in July 2020, Fiserv has been steadily shedding jobs in the face of rising costs, though it has been cagey about revealing exactly how many. As reported by trade publication Payments Dive, the company claimed for years in public filings and statements that it still has “about 44,000” employees worldwide, while also disclosing that its number of foreign employees had increased — suggesting that jobs had been offshored from the United States — and that its termination costs had jumped from $32 million in 2019 to $131 million in 2020, the year Bisignano took over.

Layoffs at the company kept at a steady tick over the years, whether the one hundred positions cut in Dublin, Ohio, in 2020, the three thousand workers (or roughly 7 percent of its workforce) it disclosed cutting in 2023, or the staff reduction it admitted to on December 5 last year (the same day Bisignano was officially tapped to lead the SSA), which one analyst estimated meant the laying off of anywhere between another 2.4 and 3.7 percent of its workforce.

“The changes that were made were basically hostile toward workers,” one longtime Fiserv employee who requested anonymity to avoid reprisal told Jacobin. “Layoffs were a regular occurrence.”

“Ever since I started, Frank’s style started to take over: more cutthroat, profit at all costs,” says another current employee.

Though the firm has played down the size of workforce reductions and avoided disclosing specific figures, current and former employees have regularly complained over the years about major job cuts on websites like Glass Door, where employees rate their current and former workplaces. Multiple Glass Door reviews put “constant layoffs” on their list of cons of working there, with employees over the years describing the layoffs as “many,” “quite high,” “common,” and “happening monthly at this point.”

“Bad leadership; non-visionary; Layoff is in the policy,” one former manager, who had worked for the firm for five years, wrote in May 2021. Fiserv has, at the time of writing, a dismal rating of 2.8 out of five stars from nearly ten thousand reviews on the website, with Bisignano himself holding an approval rating of only 33 percent.

Even ostensibly positive reviews, meaning those giving three stars or more, alluded to the same issues. “Always short staffed, systems always having issues. Queues never end,” states a September 2024 review. “Regular redundancies always hanging over you can be unsettling,” reads one of the cons from a review earlier that year. “There are too many departments and factions that are busy defending their headcount and budget from the constant staffing cuts to focus on improving client service,” a portfolio manager and five-year-veteran of the company wrote in 2023.

Fiserv employees describe seeing long-serving, valuable workers with deep institutional knowledge (“really high-caliber players”) serially laid off, with one team being reduced from around twenty to only two people, even as the size of the workload stayed more or less the same. In one round of layoffs this past year, despite an abundance of more private spaces, workers were simply called into a room in full view of the other employees to be given the bad news, before leaving the rooms visibly upset.

“They kind of put on a little show,” the longtime employee recalls. “I’m not saying that was intentional. But there wasn’t much thought to spare anyone’s privacy or respect. It’s almost sadistic, cruel.”

That employee’s grievances are echoed by the firm’s workers online: raises becoming minimal, remote work eliminated, workplace surveillance software installed, workers required to clock in and out and spend a minimum number of hours in office, and benefits like the employee stock discount reduced while health insurance deductibles grew.

In the quest for a tax break, the company in 2022 built an office in New Jersey’s Berkeley Heights, for which it reported closing roughly one hundred offices around the United States, and about which employees complained they were given an ultimatum: relocate from wherever they were in the country, or lose their jobs. The employees Jacobin spoke to confirmed workers had been offered such an ultimatum, regarding both the New Jersey hub and others.

“Fiserv under its current management cares about nothing more than tax cuts and tax incentives,” one September 2024 review from an employee of more than ten years charged. “They have been obsessed with moving positions (not people — they don’t seem to care that they are losing droves of knowledgeable people) to certain locations where they get tax incentives.”

Other objections likewise pop up again and again in employee reviews: no flexibility, zero work-life balance, a toxic work culture, a lack of parking and bathrooms, and management that treats its workers like robots instead of people.

“A lot of the best people end up leaving because they don’t want to work at a place that offers zero flexibility when they could work somewhere else,” an employee told Jacobin.

For disgruntled workers, there is a clear explanation for this. “Many complain that the CEO puts the stock before the employees,” one four-star review states, echoing a frequent charge. In his January 2025 ethics disclosure, Bisignano reported holding between $5 and 25 million in Fiserv stock, after selling more than $25 million of stock in September 2024. In public filings, the company has disclosed carrying out more than $17 billion in stock buybacks since the 2019 merger, including $5.5 billion in 2024 alone.

Many reviews date the deterioration in working conditions and company culture to its 2019 merger with FirstData and Bisignano’s subsequent ascendance to chief executive. One charged that all the pros of working for Fiserv were “until First Data took over,” at which point it became “a slow demise into hell for the common employee.” “The downward spiral of morale can be pointed to post merger with FirstData and the change of CEOs,” states another. “Was great until FirstData came along,” reads one from 2021. “New CEO is ravaging the company from inside out.”

In fact, Fiserv’s Glass Door reviews are riddled with bitter personal animus to Bisignano specifically: “The decision making in this company has been extremely erratic since Frank Bisignano took over as CEO”; “Once Frank took over, it became a horrible place to work for”; “Frank and his squad, not the greatest tbh”; “The CEO is a micromanager and only cares about the stock price”; “Replace Frank with a leader who listens.”

“CEO could care less about employees. They are all a widget and an expense to him. Mr Scrooge at his finest,” concluded one. “Frank, please go buy an island and move there, never to return.”

“It’s almost entirely negative. There’s a lot of distrust for Frank,” a Fiserv employee told Jacobin about employee attitudes toward Bisignano. “When the announcement came out about him leaving and he had a town hall, people were in a really good mood about that, about the prospect of him being gone.”