Amazon’s Quebec Exit May Be a Strategic Miscalculation
Amazon may be closing its warehouses in Quebec to send a warning to unions, but it still has to get packages to customers. For a company that thrives on controlling warehouses, this retreat may be more costly than it seems.

The Amazon Fulfillment Centre in Brampton, Canada, on April 26, 2021. (Steve Russell / Toronto Star via Getty Images)
Last May, Quebec’s Administrative Labour Tribunal certified a union of roughly 230 workers at an Amazon warehouse in Laval, a suburb just outside Montreal, Quebec. Following an inspiring campaign involving the Immigrant Workers Centre, workers joined the Confédération des syndicats nationaux (CSN) and became the first to unionize an Amazon facility in Canada.
In an act of clear retaliation, on January 22 Amazon announced its intention to shutter all of its Quebec operations, displacing nearly two thousand workers, union and nonunion alike. The move has left many grappling with its causes and implications for workers.
Closing warehouses in Quebec is intended as both a punishment for the unionized workers in Laval and a warning to others across Canada who might consider organizing. But the company’s bluster shouldn’t be mistaken for invincibility. Its restructuring in Quebec is as much a sign of vulnerability as it is strength. Now is the time for workers and unions to take stock of the structural opportunities for organizing at Amazon.