Under Austerity, Assisted Suicide Isn’t Freedom
The UK is getting closer to legalizing assisted dying. On paper it may seem compassionate, but as with the Canadian case, the problems of state austerity and medical neglect mean it remains morally and ethically questionable.

In any society marked by austerity, ageism, and anti-disability bias, assisted-suicide policies risk sacrificing those left behind by state and society. (Hiraman / Getty Imags)
The United Kingdom is moving toward legalizing medical assistance in dying, modeling its law in part on Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has drawn criticism similar to that faced by Canada’s policy, particularly concerns that poor and disabled people could be pushed toward assisted dying, not because they are terminally ill but as a result of state austerity and neglect.
Labour backbench member of Parliament Kim Leadbeater has emphasized the restrictive nature of the proposed UK law, which does indeed appear to be stricter than Canada’s. According to the BBC, those seeking an assisted death must be over eighteen years old, a resident of England or Wales, and registered with a family doctor for at least a year. Further qualifications include the requirements that applicants must face immediate death — within half a year — and have the mental capacity to decide to die or have clearly expressed such wishes ahead of time.
The process itself is highly regulated — it includes two official declarations, clearance with two doctors on two separate occasions, the sign-off of a High Court judge, and a waiting period post-approval before the patient administers the life-ending drug. These steps are intended to provide robust checks and balances, limiting eligibility to those in the final stages of terminal illness.