Why Is the Audubon Society Attacking the NLRB?
Last month, the National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint against the Audubon Society concerning treatment of its employees. In a wildly aggressive response, the nonprofit is arguing that the NLRB is unconstitutional.
A white-crowned sparrow is observed by bird enthusiasts from the Audubon Society in Menlo Park, California, on February 3, 2017. (Paul Chinn / the San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)
Early last month, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Region 2 issued a complaint against the Audubon Society, a lovable nonprofit organization focused on the protection of birds. The complaint alleges that the Audubon Society repeatedly failed and refused to furnish information requested by the union representing its employees, unilaterally implemented changes to employee health insurance without bargaining, and discriminatorily provided a long list of new benefits only to its nonunionized staffers.
That the Audubon Society is allegedly treating its employees this way is troubling, but this is all fairly regular stuff that lots of bad employers do. Everything in the NLRB complaint is based on old, well-settled areas of Board law.
The Audubon Society’s answer to the complaint is wildly aggressive, however. It contains six different arguments that the NLRB is acting unconstitutionally by trying to enforce the National Labor Relations Act against the organization.
This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.