Democrats’ Paid Leave Proposal Isn’t Actually Universal. It Can and Should Be.

There’s no reason why the Dems’ paid parental leave program can’t cover everyone.

The idea that parental leave programs should cover all parents is normal across the developed world. (Priscilla du Preez / Unsplash)


Paid leave advocates claim that the Democrats’ current paid leave proposal is universal, but it isn’t really. In order to be eligible for benefits, new parents need to have been working in the three to six months prior to birth. This work history requirement will probably exclude around one in three new mothers, including new parents who are still in education, who have a work-limiting disability, or who suffer an unluckily timed spell of unemployment.

When I make this point, some advocates respond by saying I am being ridiculous. They say that it’s no scandal that a paid leave program only covers people who were previously working, because that’s the whole point of it: to compensate people who are taking leave from their job. Below, I explain why this response is wrong and why including all new parents in a parental leave program makes sense.

1. Other countries do it.

For starters, the idea that parental leave programs should cover all parents is not something I invented. It’s pretty normal across the developed world.

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.