Australia Was Founded on an Act of Genocide. It’s Time to Make Amends.

Henry Reynolds has demolished the apologetic arguments of conservative intellectuals, showing that the British colonization of Australia was a crime even by the standards of its time. Reynolds makes a powerful argument for recognizing Aboriginal sovereignty.

New South Wales Aborigines - King Billy And His ADCS

Jimmy Clements (c. 1847–1927) was an Aboriginal elder from the Wiradjuri tribe in New South Wales. (The Print Collector / Getty Images)


A new book by Henry Reynolds, Truth-Telling: History, Sovereignty and the Uluru Statement, is the product of a lifetime spent researching the frontier wars that the British settler colonies in Australia waged against the Aboriginal people.

Reynolds takes his inspiration from the “Uluru Statement from the Heart,” released in 2017 by the First Nations National Constitutional Convention. The statement demands the Australian government to amend its constitution to mandate an indigenous voice in parliament. It also calls for a truth and reconciliation process, and a negotiated treaty between Australia and its First Nations. Although the former Liberal PM Malcolm Turnbull rejected the statement, it has since garnered public support.

Reynolds also responds to intellectuals and historians associated with the Australian right, who, following former PM John Howard, attacked what they called the “black armband” school of history. These conservative historians proposed that we should not judge Australia’s colonial settlers retrospectively, but rather understand them in light of their contemporary values and laws.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.