Spotify’s Streaming Model Is Based on Exploitation
Earlier this year, Spotify announced it would give artists and record labels a boost in promotion if they accepted a lower royalty rate — rates that are already abysmally low. Between fights over compensating artists and the unionization of podcast company workers, it’s clear that even the world of digital streaming has class conflict at its heart.

Music app Spotify announced that it’s changing how artists can promote themselves on the platform. (Unsplash)
Within days of launching their “Justice at Spotify” campaign in late October, the Union of Musicians and Allied Workers was reminded why they launched the campaign in the first place. Spotify announced in early November that it was changing how artists can promote themselves on the platform.
Billed as “a new feature,” Spotify will now allow artists and record labels to, in essence, pay for increased visibility. In exchange for a lower royalty rate, selected songs and albums will be boosted in listeners’ recommendations. The statement from Spotify reads:
In this new experiment, artists and labels can identify music that’s a priority for them, and our system will add that signal to the algorithm that determines personalized listening sessions. . . . This allows our algorithms to account for what’s important to the artist.