Syria’s Unstable Transition
Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is widely hailed as an Islamist radical gone moderate. The plaudits reflect not the real strength of Syrian democracy but international players’ belief that he can keep order.

Since taking power, Ahmed al-Sharaa’s administration has focused on gaining international support. (Ali Haj Suleiman / Getty Images)
You might think that Syria had entered a new era. Speaking to the United Nations’ General Assembly on September 24 — the first Syrian head of state to do so in six decades — interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa was widely hailed as a new leader addressing the country’s structural problems. Yet internally, the picture is much more contradictory.
October 5 saw the country’s first elections, following decades of dictatorship and fourteen years of war. Yet the process remained under the tight control of the new authorities, with political organizations banned and only individuals allowed to participate. The population was not involved either; only a few thousand were registered to vote, while the approximately sixteen million Syrians (plus six million living as a refugees abroad) were barely aware what was really happening.
Recognized Authority
It all reflected the new government’s primary aim: to control the entire Syrian territory, while centralizing power in its figurehead.