Lenin’s Final Writings Are More Talked About Than Read
Lenin died 100 years ago today, leaving behind a batch of writings that became known as his political testament. These widely misunderstood texts shed important light on his understanding of how difficult it would be to construct a socialist system in Russia.
The tensions in the final writings of Vladimir Lenin sometimes look like contradictions, but they reflect the real conflicts of a revolutionary statesman entering unknown territory. (Nikolay Andreyev / Wikimedia Commons)
Vladimir Lenin’s last writings have given rise to a surprising range of interpretations. Despite this diversity, consensus holds that in these articles, Lenin was striking new ground, extending his critique of war communism, and deepening his conception of the New Economic Policy (NEP).
Few agree about the content of Lenin’s new direction, although one may note the following coincidence: Lenin is always seen as rejecting whatever the author in question does not like about original Bolshevism.
Yet despite some new details, the themes and concerns of the final writings faithfully reflect Lenin’s long-term outlook. No critique of war communism or deepening of the NEP can be extracted from these writings. This lack of originality does not detract from their importance but, rather, strengthens their position as Lenin’s political testament.
This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.