Basic Income in a Pandemic and Beyond

Politicians who represent the interests of capital clearly grasp the point that a UBI would tilt the playing field in favor of workers. That’s why they’re fighting the idea tooth and nail, even amid an unprecedented crisis.

Coronavirus Pandemic Causes Climate Of Anxiety And Changing Routines In America

A worker at a Chipotle restaurant waits on customers through a window on March 26, 2020 in Chicago, Illinois. Scott Olson / Getty


We’re facing a crisis without precedent in modern economic history. The coronavirus pandemic will certainly have a greater impact on jobs, wages, and living standards than the financial crash of 2008; it may very well do more damage than the Great Depression. Already, we’ve seen more than 3 million people apply for unemployment benefits this week, a record-breaking figure, up from just 200,000 three weeks ago. In New York City, there’s been a 1,000 percent increase in claims.

Governments are scrambling to respond, implementing emergency measures to prop up the economy that would have been unthinkable just a few months ago. The United States Senate voted unanimously to approve a $2 trillion package of federal spending in response to the crisis.

In that context, the demand for a basic income has gained new momentum. But the politicians who passed the emergency stimulus bill clearly saw that as a bridge too far. The bill gives most Americans a one-off payment of $1,200 and temporarily extends and increases unemployment benefits for laid-off workers. That falls well short of what’s needed.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.