Politics Is Not Arithmetic

UBI advocates have a habit of mistaking politics for arithmetic. Proving that a policy is mathematically possible isn’t enough — and it can distract from more compelling left priorities.

Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang Holds Campaign Rally In New York City

Isaac Tom, 10, listens as Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang speaks during a rally in Washington Square Park, May 14, 2019 in New York City. One of Yangs major campaign promises is a universal basic income of $1,000 every month for every American 18 years and older. (Drew Angerer / Getty Images)


“Politics is not arithmetic.”

— Álvaro Cunhal, former secretary-general, Partido Comunista Português

In a response to my critique of Andrew Yang’s universal basic income (UBI) proposal, my friend Matt Bruenig of the People’s Policy Project claims that there is $5 trillion in annual capital income available to pay for a $3 trillion UBI.

There are two problems with this claim, one a matter of national income accounting, the other — the much more important one — of political economy.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.