A “Pathway to Citizenship” Is Not Enough

For years, the liberal establishment has advocated a “pathway to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants. That’s not enough. We need unconditional amnesty for all.

Speaker Pelosi Addresses The Media In Weekly Press Conference

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi holds her weekly press conference at the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center July 26, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)


Over the summer, as critics excoriated ICE’s detention centers as concentration camps, congressional Democrats approved an emergency bill that threw another $4.6 billion at the border security apparatus. Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi defended the legislation as a “necessary evil” to “get resources to the [detained] children fastest.”

Her comments were hardly out of character: Pelosi’s formal request to her colleagues to approve the spending measure came six years to the day after the then-Democratic-controlled Senate voted through a “comprehensive immigration reform” package that would have allocated ten times the amount of this year’s bill to militarize the southern border. Unlike the emergency funding measures, however, that failed measure also included a purported carrot: a “pathway to citizenship,” the holy grail for liberal politicians and pundits.

For a decade and a half, establishment Democrats have bent over backward to demonstrate their support for the proposal. Even outside the halls of mainstream liberalism, a “pathway to citizenship” has become popular. It’s included in both Bernie Sanders’s immigration platform and the recently adopted Democratic Socialists of America’s (DSA) “Support for Open Borders” resolution.

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.