On the Clock and Off

As leftists debate what their labor strategy should look like, many are turning to the rank-and-file strategy. A longtime union activist reflects on a lifetime of struggle in the rank and file.

Cannery workers in Watsonville, California march on their knees from the plant gates to a Catholic church during their eighteen-month strike in the late 1980s.


Barry Eidlin’s essay on “rank-and-file strategy” tackles the question of left activism in the workplace and attempts to place it in the context of long-term revolutionary strategy. It should go without saying that any serious socialist movement needs to engage directly with workplace struggles, and not merely in a supportive capacity. The question is how, with what expectations, and with what strategic ends in mind.

I have some specific issues with Eidlin’s essay, but what is perhaps of more concern (to me, at least) is what it does not say. What follows is less a rebuttal than an attempt to fill in the blanks.

Eidlin’s rank-and-file strategy is counterposed to a pair of approaches he attributes to other tendencies on the Left. The first of these sees “workplace organizing as a venue for socialist cadre to engage in propagandizing for revolution.” The other involves attempts to “strengthen the left-labor link through alliances with the more progressive elements of the union bureaucracy.”

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.