AI Is Here to Stay. Who’s Steering the Ship?

From the smokestacks of the Industrial Revolution to today’s neural nets, technology has always been a double-edged sword that carries the promise of liberation for workers. But cashing in on that promise requires control over how technology is deployed.

Inspection Robots Put Into Service In Electric Tunnel In Beijing

An intelligent quadruped robot from State Grid Beijing Cable Company on May 9, 2024, in Beijing, China. (Jia Tianyong / China News Service / VCG via Getty Images)


Everybody’s talking about the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. AI’s creeping omnipresence is undeniable: it’s infiltrating every gadget and platform — from our fridges (must they really be “intelligent”?) — to applications with more implications, like military uses and job automation. These alarmist narratives seem to reflect a widespread unease about AI’s impact — one that is warranted but also overshadows more optimistic discussions about the potential for productivity gains and increased leisure, if we get the dynamics of control right.

In what seems a striking acknowledgement of people’s right to be skeptical of AI, the billionaires who own and control the technology are talking about revising the social contract. Notably absent from these musings on how AI will rewire society is much discussion of human emancipation. The earlier predictions about how AI will serve as humanity’s all-purpose helper — in areas from medicine to green energy — have largely vanished. Over the past couple years, we’ve gone from the carrot of AI’s potential to the stick of a hardheaded transhumanist vision. Their recent musings essentially amount to a shrug and a warning: “We better hold on to our hats.” Still, despite the very real threats, there remains promise — if we are bold enough to seize it.

A New Social Contract? Written by Whom?

Last week, when OpenAI CEO Sam Altman repeated his belief that AI will usher in such changes that states would require a new social contract, observers were rightfully alarmed. Altman supports a universal basic income, likely because he expects that AI will lead to mass layoffs as machines replace labor. He is not alone in predicting an enormous shift; Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI company Anthropic, has also warned of massive changes in the relationship between workers and technology. Without seeming to realize it, these predictions are hitting dystopic sci-fi notes. Amodei’s candid babble about where AI is headed included the bald admission that AI’s creators — these are the people with their feet on the gas pedal, remember — expect that AI will soon be “better than humans at almost everything.”

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.