Symphonies Can’t Keep Relying on Ultrarich Donors

After a nine-month strike to prevent drastic cuts to jobs, wages, and benefits, the San Antonio Symphony has dissolved. As long as they rely on the largesse of the wealthy, orchestras and the musicians who comprise them are in danger.

Rear View Of Man Standing On Stage

Orchestras turn to private philanthropy not because it is more efficient than the government but because government endowments are next to nonexistent. (Getty Images)


For nine months, musicians with the San Antonio Symphony Orchestra struggled to save their jobs and their organization from devastating austerity. Now their long strike has finally come to an end, as orchestra management has dissolved the organization.

San Antonio symphony musicians are hopeful that they can build a new organization out of the rubble. But for reasons endemic to the live classical music industry, it will be difficult to form one devoid of the troublesome features that led to the current juncture — namely, a near-total reliance on philanthropy rather than government funds.

From the beginning of their strike, musicians understood that the organization’s dissolution was a likely outcome. The orchestra was drowning in debt, and management had not developed the skills or financial relationships necessary for survival as a leading orchestra in the United States. These relationships are life-and-death for orchestras. As the New York Times put it, “It’s Official: Many Orchestras Are Now Charities.”

This article is for subscribers only. Please login or subscribe to access our full archives and beautiful print and digital magazine starting at just $3 a month.